* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. WELL, GOOD EVENING LADIES [00:00:01] AND GENTLEMEN, AND WELCOME TO OUR CITY COUNCIL FIRE PROTECTION BOARD MEETINGS THIS EVENING. UH, WE ARE GLAD YOU'RE ALL HERE WITH US. AND SO WE WILL GET STARTED BY ASKING OUR MAYOR PRO TEM LYNN KENNEDY TO LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE TO OUR NATION'S FLAG. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR, WOULD EVERYONE PLEASE STAND AND JOIN ME. READY, BEGIN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE GLIDE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH TO STAND ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH MY LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THANK YOU. ROLL CALL. MAYOR MICHAEL IS PRESENT. MAYOR PRO TEM LYNN KENNEDY. PRESENT COUNCIL MEMBERS RYAN HUTCHINSON PRESENT. CHRISTINE SCOTT PRESENT AND ASHLEY STICKLER PRESENT. WE HAVE ONE PRESENTATION THIS EVENING, BUT BEFORE WE GET TO THAT, I WOULD ASK OUR CITY CLERK IF WE HAVE ANY AMENDMENTS OR MODIFICATIONS TO THIS EVENING'S AGENDA. WE HAVE NO AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA. MAYOR MICHAEL, THANK YOU SO MUCH. WE'LL NOW TURN TO OUR PRESENTATION AND THAT'S A PRESENTATION ON HANDS-ON ONLY CPR AND AEDS, AUTOMATIC EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATORS AND HOW THEY CAN SAVE LIVES. I'D LIKE TO CALL UPON FROM THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, OUR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT NURSE, PATTY OLT. PATTY, COME FORWARD. OH, IT'S OFFLINE. WE'RE HAVING A LITTLE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTY. IT IS CALLED HANDS ON ON THE COMPUTER. , HANDS ON THE COMPUTER. YEAH, AT THIS TIME IT DOESN'T MATTER IF THAT'S OKAY. LONG AS I CAN SEE IT. ALRIGHT, WE'RE IN BUSINESS. OKAY. UH, THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE. GOOD EVENING, HONORABLE MAYO, MICHAEL, AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. AS WE SAW IN THE NEWS RECENTLY, DEMAR HAMILL SUFFERED A BLOW TO HIS CHEST, CAUSING HIM TO GO INTO CARDIAC ARREST THIS MAY. MR. HAMILL HAD NO PULSE AND HE WAS NOT BREATHING. THE QUICK ACTIONS OF THE EMS PROVIDERS AND THE MEDICAL TEAM ON THE FOOTBALL FIELD SAVED HIS LIFE QUICK. CPR USE OF THE A ED AND GETTING HIS HEARTBEAT BACK TO NORMAL QUICKLY IS WHY HE'S ALIVE TODAY. SO LET'S GO OVER. SO I'M A QI NURSE, SO I LIKE TO TALK ABOUT STATS. UM, LAST YEAR IN THE YEAR 2022, THE CITY OF RANCH CUCAMONGA, UM, WE COLLECTED SOME DATA AND WE HAD A TOTAL OF ALL THE CPRS THAT WE DID. SO THIS INCLUDED TRAUMAS, OVERDOSES, AND CARDIAC ARREST. WE HAD A TOTAL OF 164 TOTAL CPR PATIENTS, UM, WITH OUR TEACHING, AND THIS ALSO INCLUDED, UM, CPR BY OUR SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. WE HAD A TOTAL OF 104 CITIZEN BYSTANDER CPR, WHICH IS PRETTY INCREDIBLE. OUT OF THOSE 104 40 OF THEM HAD ROSC, WHICH MEANS THEY HAD PULSES WHEN WE, UM, DELIVERED THIS PATIENT TO THE HOSPITAL. SO WE KNOW THAT HANDS ONLY CPR CAN BE VERY EFFECTIVE. IT CAN DOUBLE OR EVEN TRIPLE THE CHANCE OF SURVIVAL IF WE GET TO THE PATIENT QUICK ENOUGH. STUDIES HAVE SHOWN THAT THERE'S STILL OXYGENATED BLOOD IN THE BODY, AND THIS IS WHY THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION DID A STUDY THAT SAID MOST PEOPLE DON'T LIKE PUTTING, DOING MOUTH TO MOUTH. IT TURNS 'EM OFF, WALK AWAY. BUT THEY FOUND IF PEOPLE WOULD BE MORE ENGAGED, IF THEY USED, UM, HANDS-ONLY CPR, UM, THE BLOOD IN THIS SYSTEM WOULD STILL BE CIRCULATING AND KEEP THOSE VITAL ORGANS, UM, ALIVE. CONTINUOUS COMPRESSIONS KEPT THE BLOOD CIRCULATING, MAINTAINING THE BLOOD PRESSURE TO THE HEART, BRAIN AND LUNGS. UM, IF WE STOP TO GIVE A BREATH, THIS WOULD DECREASE THE PRESSURE IN THE BODY OF THE BLOOD PRESSURE AND REDUCE THE FLOW OF THAT OXYGENATED BLOOD TO THESE [00:05:01] VITAL ORGANS. SO, UM, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DEPARTMENT HAS A VERY, UH, ROBUST, UH, HANDS-ONLY CPR TRAINING. UM, WE TEACH TO CERT BURT SCHOOLS AND AT COMMUNITY EVENTS. JUST RECENTLY WE HAD OURS AT OUR, UM, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OPEN HOUSE AND OUR JUNIOR FIREFIGHTER CAMP. EVERY FIRE STATION IN OUR CITY IS SUPPLIED WITH MANNEQUINS TO TRAIN OUR CIVILIANS, OUR, UH, CITIZENS, SORRY, UH, WITH WHEN THEY DO STATION TOURS AND ALSO STANDBY EVENTS THAT WE ATTEND. RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DEPARTMENT TEACHES COMMUNITY CPR CLASSES. UM, WE USED TO DO THEM ON A REGULAR BASIS, BUT BECAUSE OF COVID WE DID PUT THEM ON HOLD. BUT WE HAVE PLANS OF RESUMING THIS PROGRAM. UM, IN THE NEAR FUTURE. UH, WE ALSO HAVE, AGAIN, A VERY ROBUST A ED PROGRAM, UM, THROUGHOUT OUR CITY. WE HAVE 110 AEDS LOCATED, UM, IN CITY, UM, BUILDINGS. UH, WE ALSO CARRY THEM IN THE PATROL CARS AS WELL AS ANY C CITY VEHICLES. SO, UM, KNOWING HOW TO OPERATE AS A ED IS NOT THAT HARD IF THE PERSON CAN TURN IT ON. THEN THE PROMPTS ON OUR CITY AEDS, WE'LL WALK 'EM THROUGH EVERY STEP OF WHAT THEY NEED TO DO TO APPLY THE PATCHES, AND IF SHOCKS ADVICE, IT'LL TELL 'EM HOW TO SHOCK THE PATIENT. UM, WE ALSO HAVE AN, UH, APP CALLED PULSEPOINT. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU GUYS HAVE HEARD OF THIS. IF YOU HAVEN'T, PLEASE DOWNLOAD IT. IT'S A GREAT TOOL TO HAVE. UM, BASICALLY IF SOMEBODY GOES DOWN AND THEY NEED HELP, UH, HOPEFULLY A BYSTANDER WILL CALL 9 1 1. OUR EMERGENCY MEDICAL DISPATCHERS WILL SEND OUT A MESSAGE THROUGH PULSEPOINT AND IT'LL NOTIFY YOU IF YOU HAVE, UM, PULSEPOINT ON YOUR PHONE SAYING, HEY, THERE'S SOMEBODY THAT NEEDS HELP. IF YOU KNOW CPR GO HELP, AND IT'LL ONLY ALARM IF YOU'RE IN THE AREA. SO, UH, FOR EXAMPLE, WE HAD A CASE WHERE IT HAPPENED AT, I WANNA SAY, UM, VICTORIA GARDENS AND THERE WAS A FIREFIGHTER NEARBY. PULSEPOINT ALERTED HIS PHONE AND HE WENT AND HELPED DO HANDS-ONLY CPR TO THIS, UM, PERSON UNTIL EMS ARRIVED. DEFINITELY INCREASED THE CHANCES OF THAT PATIENT'S SURVIVAL. IT ALSO, UM, IF YOU GET STUCK IN TRAFFIC ON THE FOOTHILL, IT'LL TELL YOU WHAT THE CURRENT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ARE TOO IN THE CITY, WHICH IS KIND OF COOL. UH, WE ALSO HAVE PULSE POINT FOR BUSINESS, UM, OWNERS, AND THIS IS, UH, IF YOU HAVE, UM, AN A ED IN YOUR BUSINESS, YOU CAN PULL UP THE PULSE POINT. IT'S A YELLOW APP, SO IT IS A SEPARATE APP, BUT IT'LL SHOW YOU WHERE THE PUL, THE A ED IS LOCATED, UM, IN THE PULSE, UH, IN THE APP. IT, WHEN YOU BRING UP THE BUSINESS, IT'LL SHOW YOU WHERE THE, UM, A ED IS LOCATED WITH THE PICTURE OF IT. AND THE PROCESS OF THIS IS IF THE BUSINESS, USUALLY OUR, OUR BERT PEOPLE ARE VERY, UM, INTERESTED IN THIS. THEY'LL SEND A PICTURE, UM, UM, OF WHERE IT'S LOCATED AND IT'S APPROVED BY SANDY GRIFFIN, OUR EMS ADMINISTRATOR, AND IT'LL BE PUT INTO THE APP. OKAY. THAT IS OUR THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING, UH, UH, ME TO SHARE THIS TIME. UM, IT'S A VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION. IT SAVES LIVES. WE SEE IT. I CAN'T TELL YOU, YOU KNOW, I'VE BEEN A NURSE A LONG TIME AND WORKING IN THE HOSPITAL SINCE WE'VE BEEN DOING HANDS-ON CPR, WE ARE SAVING LIVES AND WE'RE GETTING MORE PEOPLE WITH PULSES BACK TO THE HOSPITAL. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME? QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS? I HAVE ONE QUESTION, MR. MAYOR. AND THIS IS JUST, UH, TO REFRESH MY MEMORY, YOU SAID IN THE PULSEPOINT APP, IT'LL SHOW SOMEONE WHO'S ON THE APP IN A BUSINESS WHERE IT'S LOCATED LIKE PHYSICALLY IN THE BUSINESS. AM I HEAR HEARING THAT CORRECT? CORRECT. YEAH, SO WHEN YOU BRING UP THE APP, IF, UM, IF YOU'RE LOOKING FOR AN A ED, IT'LL SHOW YOU THE ICONS OF WHERE THE AEDS ARE LOCATED. SO LIKE FOR THE CITY OF RANCHO, IT'LL SHOW, THERE'LL BE ONE, LIKE AT THE, UH, ALL RISK TRAINING CENTER, THERE'LL BE ONE AT THE LIBRARY, IT'LL, AND IT'LL SHOW YOU A PICTURE OF WHAT IT ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE. FANTASTIC. THANK YOU. YEAH, I HAVE, HAVE A QUESTION, MR. MAYOR. SO IF I'M A RESIDENT AND I'M SOMEONE WATCHING RIGHT NOW AND I WANT TO LEARN THE HANDS-ON CPR, CAN YOU DIRECT ME AS TO WHERE I WOULD FIND OUT ABOUT A, AN UPCOMING CLASS OR WHEN YOU WILL START OR WHEN YOU'LL RESUME THOSE PROGRAMS? AGAIN? WE TEACH THE CLASSES THROUGH, UM, CERT AND BURT NOW ON A REGULAR BASIS. NICOLE, CAN YOU ANSWER THAT WITH THE COMMUNITY? OKAY. SO WE ENCOURAGE ALL OF OUR COMMUNITY MEMBERS TO STAY UP TO DATE ON ALL OF OUR CLASSES AND OUR PROGRAMS BY VISITING RC FIRE.ORG OR EVEN FOLLOWING US ON SOCIAL MEDIA. THAT'S WHERE THEY COULD GET THE MOST UP-TO-DATE INFORMATION. THANK YOU. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. IT'S VERY INFORMATIVE FOR OUR COMMUNITY AND CERTAINLY WHAT WE WANT TO AGAIN, COMMEND YOU AND THE REST OF THE DEPARTMENT ON MAKING SURE THAT WE ARE DOING OUR VERY BEST TO TRAIN AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE BECAUSE AS YOU STATED, IT CERTAINLY DOES SAVE LIVES. THANK YOU. AND IT'S MUCH EASIER THAN THE OLD WAY OF DOING CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION. YEAH, IT'S DEFINITELY USER FRIENDLY. ABSOLUTELY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. [00:10:01] THIS NOW BRINGS US TO THE PORTION OF OUR MEETING THAT IS PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS, AND THIS IS A TIME IN THE PLACE FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL AND FIRE BOARD ON ANY ITEM INCLUDED ON THIS EVENING'S AGENDA OR ANY ITEM THAT'S NOT EVEN NOT ON THE AGENDA. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES PER INDIVIDUAL, DEPENDING ON THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE DESIRING TO SPEAK. WE HAVE, IT LOOKS LIKE ONE SPEAKER TONIGHT. YOU HAVE FIVE MINUTES TO MAKE YOUR PRESENTATION AND THAT SPEAKER IS JANET WALTON. JANET, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE PRIVILEGE TO BE HERE AGAIN AND PRAY. HEAVENLY FATHER, I AM TRULY SO HONORED AND GRATEFUL TO BE, UH, IN THE LIVING IN THIS GREAT CITY OF RANCH U CUCAMONGA. AND AS A GOOD CITIZEN, IT IS MY DUTY AND IT'S MY HONOR TO LIFT UP OUR LEADERSHIP HERE AND THE EMPLOYEES, OUR FIRST RESPONDERS AND THEIR FAMILIES, AND LIFT THEM UP TO YOU. AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR OVERSEEING OF THE CITY. I BELIEVE YOU ARE STRONGLY HERE. I I REALIZE FULLY THAT NOT EVERYONE BELIEVES IN GOD, BUT THERE ARE ENOUGH OF US THAT DO, AND THAT'S WHAT MATTERS. AND PRAYERFULLY OTHERS WILL COME ALONG AND SEE WHO YOU ARE AND, AND WHAT YOU HAVE, THE PRICE YOU'VE PAID FOR US, AND HOW WE CAN CONTINUE TO GROW IN THIS CITY AND BECOME MODEL CITIZENS. SHALL I SAY, TO YOUR GLORY, TO YOUR HONOR FOR THE GOOD OF THE CITY, THAT WE CAN TAKE EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW LOVE AND KINDNESS AND YES, HAVE BOUNDARIES WHERE BOUNDARIES ARE NECESSARY, BUT SHE'LL ALWAYS CHOOSE THE BETTER. ALWAYS CHOOSE TO PULL OUT THE GOLD IN SOMEONE RATHER THAN ALWAYS LOOK AT THE NEGATIVE. SO I THANK YOU FOR THIS HONOR. I THANK YOU FOR THIS PRIVILEGE. I THANK YOU FOR CONTINUING TO OVERSEE AND TO GUIDE OUR LEADERSHIP HERE. OUR MAYOR, MAYOR, PRO TEM, COUNCIL MEMBERS, OUR OUR POLICE, OUR FIRE DEPARTMENT, OUR FIRST RESPONDERS IN EVEREST, RESPECT, AND OUR EMPLOYEES, THAT ONES THAT WORK SO FAITHFULLY, UM, THANK YOU AND THEIR FAMILIES. THEY PAY A GREAT PRICE FOR THEM TO BE HERE. I THANK YOU FOR THIS GREAT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND AS I'VE PRAYED BEFORE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, I PRAY THAT YOU BRING US TOGETHER AS ONE, AS ONE. UM, YES, DIFFERENT PERSONALITIES, BUT ONE, ONE I PRAY AND I THANK YOU FATHER FOR THE LEADERSHIP, UM, IN THE UNITED STATES AS, AS IT SAYS IN GOD WE TRUST AND AS IT SAYS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD. SO I THANK YOU FOR EVERY OPPORTUNITY TO ACKNOWLEDGE YOU AND YOUR WILL IN YOUR WAYS IN EACH ONE OF US. AND I PRAY ALL OF THIS IN JESUS' NAME. AMEN. AMEN. THANK YOU. WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO OUR CONSENT CALENDARS. AND THEY ARE EXPECTED TO BE ROUTINE AND NON-CONTROVERSIAL. THEY'LL BE ACTED UPON AT ONE TIME WITHOUT DISCUSSION. ANY ITEM MAY BE REMOVED FOR BY A COUNCIL MEMBER IF THEY SO DESIRE TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ON THAT PARTICULAR ITEM OR ITEMS. DO WE HAVE ANY, MR. MAYOR, I NEED TO ABSTAIN FROM ITEM D TWO DUE TO POSSIBLE CONFLICT OF INTEREST AS SOCAL GAS IS MY EMPLOYER. OKAY, ABSTENTION IS NOTED. AND DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR? MOVE FOR APPROVAL. SECOND, PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE WITH COUNCIL MEMBER SCOTT AND STANDING ON ITEM D TWO. AND OUR NEXT, WE HAVE ONE CONSENT ORDINANCE THIS EVENING AND THE SAME THING APPLIES. IT'S A CONSENT ORDINANCE. IT'S ALREADY HAD A PUBLIC HEARING, AND SO THIS EVENING, UH, WE WILL TAKE THAT UP UNLESS ANY COUNCIL MEMBER DESIRES TO PULL IT OFF THE CONSENT CALENDAR FOR DISCUSSION. WE'LL HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SECOND READING AND ADOPTION OF THE ORDINANCE. SO CAN WE GET THAT ADOPTION TO BE READ BY TITLE ONLY? DO WE HAVE A MOTION IN THE SECOND? SO MOVED. VERY GOOD. WAS THERE A MO DID SOMEONE MAKE THE MOTION? I I DIDN'T HEAR IT A SECOND. NOT A SECOND. I SECOND. THANK YOU. OKAY, VERY GOOD. ORDINANCE NUMBER 1 0 1 4. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING SECTIONS ONE 0.5 6.0 1 0, 10 0.5 6.020, AND 10.5 6.30 OF THE RANCHO CUCA MONTGOMERY MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALTER TRUCK ROUTES, MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF AND MAKING A DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. THANK YOU. PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. VERY GOOD, THANK YOU. THERE ARE NO ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS THIS EVENING, BUT WE DO HAVE TWO PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. SO WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO THOSE PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. AND THE FIRST ITEM, I'LL TURN THAT OVER TO OUR CITY MANAGER, MR. GILSON? YES. THANK YOU MR. MAYOR. SO THE FIRST ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM THAT YOU HAVE, ITEM G ONE, UM, IS A PUBLIC HEARING [00:15:01] AND THAT IS CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL, UH, FOR DRC 2022 DASH 0 0 4 4 5 AND DRC 2022 DASH 4 4 9 FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW DRC 20 19 8 50 ISLAND VIEW VENTURES, LLC IS THE APPLICANT AND YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU, UM, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND DESIGN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 311 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 16,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL LEASE AREA, AND IT WOULD SIT ON ABOUT 7.94 ACRES OF LAND AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FOOTHILL AND HAVEN IN THE MIXED USE URBAN CORRIDOR. SO, UM, I WANNA NOTE BEFORE I TURN IT OVER TO, UH, UH, TAVA AND SEAN FOR THE PRESENTATION TONIGHT THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FOLLOWING THE DELIVERY OF THIS PACKET. UM, IT HAS COME IN SUCCESSIVE WAVES OF INFORMATION, UH, CULMINATING, UH, WITH THE LATEST BEING TODAY, AND ALL OF IT IS UP HERE ON THE DAIS, UH, IN FRONT OF EACH OF YOU. SO I WANT TO NOTE FOR THE RECORD THAT ALL THAT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE TO THE COUNCIL FOR THEIR, UH, CONVERSATION AND DISCUSSION TONIGHT AND ALSO AVAILABLE FOR THE PUBLIC TO REVIEW, UM, AS APPROPRIATE. SO WITH THAT, I'LL TURN IT OVER TO TABA FOR THE STAFF REPORT. GOOD EVENING COUNSEL. UM, AS JOHN STATED BEFORE YOU, TONIGHT IS AN APPEAL FOR A PRO, UH, A PROJECT THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND IT DOES INCLUDE 311 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND 16,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL. UM, WE RECEIVED ONE APPEAL FROM THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER, UM, UM, BARTON PLAZA. AND THEIR MAIN, UH, CONTENT, UH, DISCONTENT WITH THE PROJECT IS THE AVAILABILITY OF ONSITE PARKING. AND WE ALSO RECEIVED A SECOND APPEAL FROM LU O DRURY. AND THEIR ISSUE WITH THE PROJECT IS THE CQA REVIEW RELATED TO INDOOR AIR QUALITY FROM FORMALDEHYDE AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. AND ADDITIONALLY, WE RECEIVED A LETTER AS JOHN STATED TODAY, AND THEY ADDED SOME, UM, QUESTIONS ABOUT BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. THIS IS THE PROJECT SITE, IT IS JUST NORTH OF THE COUNTY COURTHOUSE. UM, THE PROJECT WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED WITH THOSE TWO EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGS THAT YOU SEE TODAY, AND THERE WERE TWO ADDITIONAL OFFICE BUILDINGS THAT WERE GOING TO BE ON THIS PARCEL SITE ALONG WITH A PARKING GARAGE. THOSE ADDITIONAL BUILDINGS WERE NEVER CONSTRUCTED AND THE PROJECT HAS BEEN FOR THE LAST CLOSE TO, YOU KNOW, 30 YEARS AS YOU SEE IT TODAY. THIS IS THE SITE AS SEEN FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD LOOKING SOUTH WITH A COUNTY COURTHOUSE IN THE BACKGROUND. THIS IS THE APPROVED SITE PLAN. IT INCLUDES, UM, THE TWO INCLUDES FOUR, FOUR STORY BUILDINGS. IT INCLU, IT HAS A MAIN DRIVE AISLE THAT COMES OFF OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, WHICH IS IN THE SAME LOCATION AS THE EXISTING MAIN ENTRANCE OFF OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. UM, IT WILL INCLUDE, UH, IT IS IMPROVED WITHIN A NEW SINGLE IZED, UH, INTERSECTION AT THE MAIN DRIVE AISLE. UM, THE PROJECT WAS APPROVED PRIOR TO THE FORM-BASED CODE REQUIREMENTS, BUT THE PROJECT WAS DESIGNED TO INCORPORATE MANY OF THOSE, UM, NEW REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING BEING THE FIRST PROJECT THAT WILL HAVE A FRONTAGE ROAD SEPARATING THE PROJECT SITE FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. AND THAT'LL INCLUDE ANGLED PARKING IN THAT, UH, FRONTAGE ROAD WILL BE TWO NEW DRIVE VILES, TWO NEW DRIVE ACCESSES THAT WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL ACCESS. SO EVERY CAR DOES NOT NEED TO GO THROUGH THAT MAIN DRIVE ISLE AND IT WILL SERVE THE BARTON PLAZA BUILDING IN THE CIVIC CENTER PLAZA BUILDING. UM, THE FRONT, THE FRONTAGE ROAD WILL ALSO HAVE, UM, COMMERCIAL LINING THOSE BUILDINGS ON THE FIRST FLOOR AND ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS. UM, TENANTS WILL BE LOCATED LINING THE MAIN DRIVE VI FROM UH, FOOTHILL BOULEVARD. THIS IS THE ELEVATION LOOKING SOUTHWEST. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THE PROJECT IS DESIGNED WITH A MODERN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN THEME AND INCLUDES FLAT ROOF TOWER ELEMENTS WITH VERTICAL SIDING, RECESS WINDOWS WITH BALCONIES, ROOF DECKS, AND GLASS, UH, COMMERCIAL STOREFRONTS. AND YOU CAN ALSO SEE THAT EACH OF THE TWO FRONTING FOOTHILL FRONTING BUILDINGS HAVE ROOF DECKS. THIS IS LOOKING SOUTHEAST DOWN THE MAIN DRIVE VILE. THIS IS A VIEW LOOKING NORTH AND IT SHOWS THE, UH, RECREATION AMENITY ADJACENT TO THIS, [00:20:01] THE SOUTH TWO BUILDINGS AND UP THE MAIN DRIVE AISLE WITH A COMMERCIAL ON EACH SIDE. AND THERE'S SOME ADDITIONAL, UH, RECREATIONAL AMENITIES. UM, THE FIRST APPEAL IS, UH, BARTON PLAZA, UM, EAGLE GROUP LLC. THEY RAISE CONCERN RELATED TO THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF ONSITE PARKING AND THE METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE PARKING STUDY SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE PROJECT. UM, WE STAFF WANTS TO RESPOND THAT THE STATE AND LOCAL, UH, DENSITY, UM, PROVISIONS REDUCED THE BY RIGHT THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL UNITS IN THE PROJECT THAT PROVIDES AFFORDABLE UNITS. SO BASICALLY THIS PROJECT REQUESTED A DENSITY BONUS. THIS DENSITY BONUS DOES NOT INCLUDE ADDITIONAL UNITS. THIS, THE DENSITY BONUS, UM, REGULATIONS ALLOW YOU TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED PARKING IF YOU PROVIDE A CERTAIN THRESHOLD OF AFFORDABLE UNITS. IN THIS CASE, THE PROJECT IS PROVIDING 5% AFFORDABLE UNITS AT VERY LOW INCOME. UM, AS PROPOSED, THE PROJECT WILL PROVIDE 456 PARKING SPACES FOR A TOTAL OF 25 SPACES ABOVE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY THE DENSITY BONUS LAW. THE PROJECT WILL ALSO BE SUBJECT TO AN APPROVED PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN TO ASSURE THE AVAILABILITY OF ONSITE PARKING. UM, A A INTERESTING POINT ON THE, UH, THE DENSITY BONUS REQUIREMENTS OR PROVISION IS THAT IT DOESN'T ALLOW JUST A REDUCTION ON THE UNITS THAT ARE AFFORDABLE. IT'S FOR THE ALL THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS. SO IT BASICALLY REDUCES THE PARKING OVER CODE REQUIREMENT BY HALF A PERCENT FOR EACH BEDROOMS FOR ONE TWOS AND THREES, AND IT ELIMINATES ANY REQUIREMENT FOR GUEST PARKING. UM, THE SECOND APPEAL IS FROM LU O DRURY, AND THEY CONTEND THAT THE CITY, UH, SQUA REVIEW DID NOT ANALYZE THE IMPACT OF THE PROJECT ON FUTURE INDOOR AIR QUALITY DUE TO FORMALDEHYDE AND CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. UM, SQL GUIDELINE SECTION 1 5 1 8 3 REQUIRES AN ANALYSIS OF IMPACTS THAT ARE PECULIAR TO THE PROJECT OR THE PROJECT SITE. HOWEVER, THE COMPOSITION OF WOOD MATERIALS USED IN BUILDING INDUSTRY IS NOT A SITE OR PROJECT SPECIFIC ISSUE. FORMALDEHYDE IS IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL IS AN ISSUE ASSOCIATED WITH ALL CONSTRUCTION, SO IT DOES NOT MERIT ADDITIONAL ANALYSIS UNDER SECTION 1 5 180 3. THE PROJECT IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE CALIFORNIA CODES AND REGULATIONS, WHICH ARE DESIGNED TO ADDRESS POTENTIAL EMISSIONS AND RISKS FROM BUILDING MATERIAL. STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE CQA SECTION 1 15 1 8 3 COMPLIANCE MEMORANDUM PREPARED FOR THE PROJECT ADEQUATELY ADDRESSES THE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND HAS INCORPORATED THE NECESSARY MITIGATIONS TO MINIMIZE SUCH IMPACTS. CQA GUIDELINE 1 5 8 3 REQUIRES AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACTS THAT ARE PECULIAR TO A PROJECT AS STATED. AND THE PROJECT SITE, UM, STAFF IS AL ALSO ASKING THE COUNCIL TO APPROVE, UH, A BIT OF AN UPDATE TO THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN TO BETTER ADDRESS ANY FUTURE PARKING, UH, ISSUES THAT MIGHT ARISE ON THE PROJECT. AND BASICALLY THE, THE MAIN CHANGE IS THAT ANY REVISIONS TO THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR ONLY IF HE OR SHE FINDS THAT THE REVISION WILL NOT CAUSE A PARKING IMPACT FOR THE PROJECT. UM, THE APPLICANT, UM, IS HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AND THEY'VE ALSO HAD A MEETING, UM, IN THE LAST FEW DAYS WITH THE BARTON PLAZA PROPERTY OWNERS AND THEY'VE COME TO SOME AGREEMENTS ABOUT SOME CHANGES THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO MAKE IN THE, UH, FUTURE TO THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT WAS PART OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL. AND ONCE THEY, THOSE CHANGES ARE MADE, THIS, THE PLANNING DIRECTOR WILL REVIEW THOSE CHANGES AND SEE IF, IF THEY FEEL LIKE THEY'RE JUSTIFIED AND THAT THEY WILL ACCOMPLISH THE, THE, THE, THE REQUIRED GOALS OF MAKING SURE THAT THERE'S ADEQUATE PARKING FOR ALL THE USES ON THE SITE. UM, WITH THAT STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DENY THE APPEALS OF DRC 20 22 0 0 4 4 5, AND DRC 20 22 0 0 4 4 4 4 9 AND UPHOLD THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE THE DESIGN REVIEW DRC 20 19 0 0 8 5 OH WITH THE UPDATED [00:25:01] LANGUAGE FOR THE CONDITION REGARDING THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN WITH THAT STAFF'S AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. VERY GOOD. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF BEFORE WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? SEEING NONE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. I KNOW WE HAVE, UH, THE APPELLANTS AND THE APPLICANT THAT DESIRE TO SPEAK ON THIS MATTER. SO OUR FIRST SPEAKER IS ALBEIT EAGLE CELL HUNT BRALEY. GOOD EVENING MAYOR. MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, MY NAME IS HUNT BRAWLEY WITH THE FIRM OF POOL SHAFFEY. WE WERE RETAINED BY BARTON PLAZA EAGLE CELL AFTER THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL TO FILE AN APPEAL AND WORK WITH THE APPLICANT ON THE CONCERNS WE HAD WITH WITH PARKING. WE'RE CERTAINLY AWARE THAT YOU'VE RECEIVED A LOT OF TECHNICAL ANALYSIS, NOT ONLY FROM THE CONSULTANT FOR THE APPLICANT, BUT FROM MAC ENGINEERING, WHICH WE RETAINED OVER THE HOLIDAYS AND SUBMITTED THAT LAST WEEK. BOTH ENGINEERS ARE PROFESSIONALS AND HAVE DISCUSSED IN GREAT DETAIL THE SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS AND THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN. THE BOTTOM LINE IS NO ONE IS FOR SURE HOW THE SHARED PARKING WILL WORK UNTIL THE NEW PROJECT IS ACTUALLY BUILT AND PEOPLE ARE ACTUALLY UTILIZING THE FACILITY. ONE POINT WE'D LIKE TO MAKE, WHICH REALLY DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE, THE APPLICANT, BUT JUST MORE OF A POLICY POINT OF VIEW. AS WAS INDICATED IN THE PRESENTATION, YOU'RE GETTING 16 AFFORDABLE UNITS OUT OF 311, 11 FOR ONLY 5%. STATE LAW IS NOW REQUIRING YOU TO PROVE ONE THIRD LESS PARKING. WE'RE NOT CONTENDING YOU HAVE ANY OPTION ON THAT. WE UNDERSTAND WHY THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED THAT IT MAKES SENSE. IT KEEPS THEM FROM HAVING TO BUILD A PARKING STRUCTURE, BUT THAT'S ONE THIRD LESS PARKING THAT THE OTHERWISE WOULD HAVE TO PROVIDE. AND SO AS YOU CONSIDER THESE ISSUES IN THE FUTURE AND WHAT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IS MANDATING ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, YOU MAY WANNA LOOK AT THOSE TYPES OF EXTREME, UH, DECISIONS. THEY MAKE THAT AFFECT, IN OUR OPINION, POTENTIALLY THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER. ONE OF THE ISSUES WE WOULD LIKE THE CITY TO CONFIRM GOING FORWARD IS THAT UNDER YOUR CODE, EVEN IF YOU TAKE THE ANALYSIS BY LSA, UH, OF THE RESTRICT OF THE, THE THINGS YOU CAN ELIMINATE FROM THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDINGS, WHICH WAS ALMOST 153,000, WE WOULD NEED 510 20 SPACES FOR THE TWO EXISTING OFFICE BUILDINGS UNDER YOUR COAT. AND WITH THE APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT, THERE WILL NOT BE THOSE SPACES AVAILABLE. SO WE THINK IT'S APPROPRIATE FOR THE CITY GOING FORWARD TO CONFIRM TO THIS PROPERTY OWNER AND THE OTHER OFFICE BUILDING THAT THEY DO HAVE UNDER THIS SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT, ARE GOOD OR APPROVED, DENIED POTENTIALLY CODE COMPLIANT PARKING. 'CAUSE AS YOU MAY KNOW, MY CLIENT ENTERS INTO LEASES WITH THEIR TENANTS AND PART OF THOSE LEASES STANDARD FORM LEASES ARE SAYING THAT THEY'RE PROVIDING THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED BY THE CITY. SO WE THINK BECAUSE OF WHAT THE STATE IS DOING WITH THEIR DENSITY BONUS LAW, WE NEED SOME ASSURANCE GOING FORWARD THAT THE CITY CONFIRMS THAT WE HAVE CODE COMPLIANT PARKING. 'CAUSE CLEARLY IF YOU ADD UP THE NUMBERS, WE POTENTIALLY WON'T WITH THE NUMBER OF PARKINGS AVAILABLE. I ALSO KNOW THE STAFF REPORT, UH, EVEN THOUGH THE THE PLANNER DID NOT MENTION IT, TALKED ABOUT CCNRS AND WE ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THAT IS SOMETHING THE CITY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH. I THINK THE MAIN FOCUS TONIGHT AND IN THE FUTURE IS GONNA BE THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN. UM, I APPRECIATE THE AMENDMENT THAT STAFF IS PROPOSING FOR THAT. UH, YOU HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED WITH SPECIFIC FIVE POINTS THAT WE HAVE DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT AND WE, WE BELIEVE WILL MAKE THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN WORK MUCH MORE EFFECTIVELY FOR THE OFFICE BUILDINGS, INCLUDING EXCLUSIVE RESERVE USE FOR 217 SPACES, 8:00 AM TO 5:00 PM MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY FOR OUR FACILITY, 50 SPACES ADJACENT TO OUR FACILITY, WHICH WILL BE EXCLUSIVELY USED FOR OUR BUILDING. AND I THINK THE OTHER BUILDING AS WELL, QUARTERLY REPORTS TO THE CITY. ONE THING WE WOULD LIKE THE CITY TO, TO DISCUSS AND DISCLOSE TO US OR IN THE NEAR FUTURE, WHICH CITY DEPARTMENT WILL [00:30:01] BE THE FOCAL POINT FOR THESE REPORTS AND CAN BE WORKED WITH IF THERE ARE ANY ISSUES AS WE GET THESE QUARTERLY REPORTS AND WE FIND OUT POTENTIALLY IN THE FUTURE THAT THERE IS PARKING PROBLEMS AND THERE'S NOT ENOUGH SUFFICIENT PARKING. AND THEN WE'VE ALSO ENTERED INTO, UH, AN AGREEMENT ON A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN WITH THE APPLICANT ON HOW TO DEAL WITH THE FACT THAT DURING THE CONSTRUCTION THERE WILL BE EVEN LESS PARKING AVAILABLE AND HOW WE WILL DEAL WITH THAT. SO IN CLOSING, WE APPRECIATE THE CONSIDERATION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OUR APPEAL. WE APPRECIATE THE APPLICANT'S WILLINGNESS TO WORK WITH US AND WE'VE ENGAGED WITH THEM ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS AND HOPE THAT THE COUNCIL AND STAFF WILL IMPLEMENT THE PROVISIONS AND CHANGES TO THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN WE'VE AGREED TO, AND THEN WE WILL WORK WITH THEM GOING FORWARD AND HOPEFULLY THIS CAN BE A PROJECT THAT WILL BE SUCCESSFUL NOT ONLY FOR THEM, BUT FOR THE CITY AND FOR THE EXISTING PROPERTY OWNERS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU, SIR. APPRECIATE THAT. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS ANOTHER APPELLATE FROM LEISURE DURY, AND THAT IS ADAM FRANKEL. GOOD EVENING MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL. MY NAME IS ADAM FRANKEL. I'M AN ATTORNEY WITH LOZO JURY. WE'RE AN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW FIRM REPRESENTING SUPPORTERS. ALLIANCE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY ARE SAFER, EXCUSE ME, SAFER, RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL GRANT ITS APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF THE FOOTHILL CENTER MIXED USE PROJECT BECAUSE THE PROJECT HAS NOT YET COMPLIED WITH CQA, THE CITY RELIES ON THE 2021 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, OR EIR AND C Q'S STREAMLINING PROVISION TO AVOID PREPARING EITHER AN MND OR AN EIR FOR THE PROJECT. BUT OUR INDEPENDENT EXPERT REVIEW, WHICH WAS ASSISTED BY BIOLOGIST SEAN SMALLWOOD, AN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENIST FRANCIS FERMAN, INDICATE THAT THE CITY MUST PREPARE AN AT LEAST AN M AND D OR AN EIR FOR THIS PROJECT IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, SEQUENCE STREAMLINING PROVISIONS EXEMPT A LEAD AGENCY FROM HAVING TO CONDUCT S QL REVIEW OF CERTAIN TOPICS. BUT AS IS THE CASE HERE, WHEN AN IMPACT HAS NOT BEEN ADDRESSED AS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT IN THE PRIOR EI IN THE PRIOR GENERAL PLAN, EIR, THE AGENCY MUST PREPARE AN INITIAL STUDY FOLLOWED BY AN M AND D OR EIR TO FULLY AN ANALYZE AND MITIGATE THAT IMPACT. HERE, THE PROJECT WILL HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ON BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND HUMAN HEALTH THAT WERE NOT ANALYZED BY THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, EIR, UH, WHICH IS THE CA DOCUMENT WHICH THE PROJECT IS CURRENTLY RELYING UPON FOR USE OF THE STREAMLINING PROVISION. AS A RESULT, THE CITY IS REQUIRED TO PREPARE AN INITIAL STUDY AND AN MND OR AN EIR TO ADDRESS THESE IMPACTS. PRIOR TO APPROVING THE PROJECT, OUR WILDLIFE EXPERT, DR. SEAN SMALLWOOD, FOUND THAT THE PROJECT WILL HAVE MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ON BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES, WHICH WERE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS BY THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, EIR AMONG THESE FIRST, THE PROJECT WOULD DEVELOP ONE OF THE ONLY REMAINING OPEN SPACE PARCELS IN THE AREA RESULTING IN HABITAT LOSS AND FURTHER FRAGMENTATION OF HABITAT IN AN AREA WHICH IS ALREADY UNDERGOING SEVERE HABITAT FRAGMENTATION. THIS HABITAT LOSS WILL RESULT IN THE IMMEDIATE DECLINE IN BIRDS, INCLUDING SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES OF BIRDS, BUT WILL ALSO RESULT IN THE PERMANENT LOSS OF REPRODUCTIVE CAPACITY FOR THOSE BIRDS. BASED ON DR. SMALLWOOD'S ANALYSIS, THE LOSS OF HABITAT AT THE PROJECT SITE WILL GENERATE, EXCUSE ME, WILL PREVENT GENERATING 181 NEW BIRDS PER YEAR. SECOND, BECAUSE THE PROJECT SITE IS PART OF AN INCREASINGLY SMALL AREA OF OPEN SPACE WITHIN AN URBAN SETTING, THE SITE IS CRITICALLY IMPORTANT FOR WILDLIFE MOVEMENT. BY DEVELOPING THE PROJECT SITE WILDLIFE WILL BE FURTHER CUT OFF FROM STOPOVER AND STAGING OPPORTUNITIES, FORCING BIRDS TO TRAVEL AND OTHER WILDLIFE TO TRAVEL FURTHER BETWEEN REMAINING STOPOVER SITES. THIS INCREASES THE RISKS OF EXHAUSTION AND DISORIENTATION FOR THOSE SPECIES. FINALLY, THE GLASS FACADES OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL RESULT IN FATALITIES TO BIRDS AS A RESULT OF WINDOW COLLISIONS. AND DR. SMALLWOOD ESTIMATES THAT GIVEN THE CURRENT, UH, DESIGN FEATURES OF THE BUILDING THAT WOULD RESULT IN 184 BIRD DEATHS PER YEAR AS A RESULT OF THE PROJECT, AGAIN, SPECIFICALLY IMPACTING SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES OF BIRDS. IN ADDITION, FRANCIS OFFERMAN, A CERTIFIED INDUSTRIAL HYGIENIST, FOUND THAT FUTURE RESIDENTS AND EMPLOYEES LIVING AND WORKING AT THE PROJECT WILL FACE ELEVATED CANCER RISKS FROM INDOOR EMISSIONS OF FORMALDEHYDE FROM, UH, WIDELY USED INDOOR BUILDING MATERIALS. I DID JUST WANT TO CLARIFY ONE POINT, WHICH IS THAT THE TERM PECULIAR TO THE [00:35:01] PROJECT IS DEFINED UNDER SQUA GUIDELINES, SECTION 1 5 1 8 3 A. UM, AND IT IS A TERM OF ART WITH A SPECIFIC MEANING UNDER THAT REGULATION. UH, IT DOES REQUIRE, EXCUSE ME, MITIGATION AND ANALYSIS OF AN IMPACT IF THAT IMPACT, IF NEW SUBSTANTIAL NEW INFORMATION SHOWS THAT POLICIES PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED POLICIES OR STANDARDS WILL NOT SUBSTANTIALLY MITIGATE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, THE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT. SO IN THIS CASE, BECAUSE THERE WERE NOT PREVIOUS POLICIES OR ANALYSES OF THE IMPACT OF FORMALDEHYDE UNDER THE GENERAL PLAN EIR, THAT IS A SIGNIFICANT NEW EFFECT, WHICH WE'VE PRESENTED SUBSTANTIAL INFORMATION SHOWING THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE HUMAN HEALTH RISK IMPACT, WHICH NEEDS TO BE STUDIED FURTHER BY EITHER AN MND OR AN EIR. SPECIFICALLY, MR. ERMAN FOUND THAT WITHOUT MITIGATION, THE OFF-GASSING OF FORMALDEHYDE FROM THE PROJECT WOULD RESULT IN AN EXCESS CANCER RISK TO FUTURE RESIDENTS OF THE PROJECT OF 120 PER MILLION, WHICH IS 10 TIMES GREATER THAN THE SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT THRESHOLD OF 10 PER MILLION TO CLOSE THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, EIR DID NOT ANALYZE ANY OF THESE IMPACTS AS SIGNIFICANT, AND THE CITY CAN THEREFORE NOT RELY ON SQA GUIDELINES, SECTION 1 5 1 8 3 TO AVOID ANALYZING AND MITIGATING THESE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS SAFER. THEREFORE, RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THE CITY GRANT OUR APPEAL AND SEND THE PROJECT BACK TO STAFF TO CONDUCT THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AS REQUIRED BY CQA. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OUR NEXT SPEAKER IS THE APPLICANT AND THAT WILL BE JEFF MOUT. MR. MOUT. THEY SPENT A LOT OF TIME WITH THOSE, SO I WANNA PUT 'EM OUT THERE. , UM, HONORABLE MAYOR MICHAEL AND COUNCIL MEMBERS. UM, I WANNA BEGIN BY THANKING STAFF FOR THEIR VERY COMPREHENSIVE STAFF REPORT. UM, THE DESIGN TEAM WORKED WITH STAFF FOR A GOOD YEAR AND A HALF TO CREATE, UM, TURN THIS VACANT, YOU KNOW, PARKING LOT INTO A PROJECT THAT IS FULLY CONSISTENT WITH YOUR NEW GENERAL PLAN AND YOUR VISION FOR, UM, THIS AREA. UM, WE THINK THAT IT'LL BE A GREAT ADDITION AND, UH, WANNA POINT OUT THAT THE, BOTH THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE PROJECT WITHOUT CHANGES. SO WE, AGAIN, THAT YEAR AND A HALF OF, OF THOUSANDS OF HOURS OF DESIGN WORK, UM, IS, IS DEFINITELY SHOWN IN THAT, IN THOSE APPROVALS. UM, TONIGHT THERE'S TWO APPEALS. UM, THERE'S THE ONE FROM LOZO DRURY, UM, AND THE IN, IN THEIR, THEY HAVE TWO, TWO LETTERS, OBVIOUSLY THE NEW ONE TODAY. YEAH, WE, WE'VE LOOKED AT THOSE. OUR, OUR, OUR EXPERTS HAVE LOOKED AT THEM ALSO, AND THEY FOUND ABSOLUTELY NO VALID ISSUES RAISED BY THOSE, UM, AND NO ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED BY THE, UM, FINAL EIR FOR THE GENERAL PLAN OR THE ALMOST 800 PAGE ANALYSIS, 15 180 3 ANALYSIS DONE SPECIFICALLY FOR THIS PROJECT BY MICHAEL BAKER AND ASSOCIATES, MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL. UM, AS FAR AS THE NEIGHBOR PARKING APPEAL, UH, WORKED VERY WELL WITH, UM, MR. BRALEY, UM, AND VERY HAPPY WITH HOW THAT IS ALL GOING. UM, I WILL SAY THAT, UH, WE PUT TOGETHER, UH, OUR EXPERT LSA PUT TOGETHER A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENT LETTER OF MAT ENGINEERING AND, UM, CLARIFIED AND CORRECTED, UH, SOME OF THOSE COMMENTS. AND SO THERE WERE NO ULTIMATELY NO CHANGES NEEDED TO OUR SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS. I DO WANT TO POINT OUT TWO THINGS ABOUT PARKING, EVEN THOUGH WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT PARKING TOO MUCH TONIGHT. ONE, UM, THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CATEGORY THAT WE CHOSE, WHICH IS 5% VERY LOW, IS GENERALLY IN MOST CITIES, THE MOST DIFFICULT TO COMPLY WITH. IT IS, UM, UH, AND AS THAT'S REALLY WHY WE CHOSE THAT, YOU KNOW, ECONOMICALLY, THE, THE STATE HAS DECIDED THERE'S, YOU CAN GO WITH A, WITH A LOW INCOME OR A MODERATE INCOME, BUT WE CHOSE THE MOST DIFFICULT ONE, AND WE THINK THAT WILL BE A, A GOOD ADDITION TO THE CITY TO HAVE THOSE 16 UNITS AVAILABLE FOR, UH, PEOPLE WHO REALLY, QUITE HONESTLY NEED THEM AND HELP THIS CITY BE WHAT IT IS. UM, AND AS FAR AS THE SHARED PARKING, UM, EVEN THOUGH WE, WE RELIED ON THE DENSITY BONUS HERE, WE ALSO COULD HAVE RELIED ON 17.6 4.060, WHICH IS YOUR SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS. OUR SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS SHOW WE'RE IN FULLY IN COMPLIANCE WITH, UM, THE, UH, 17, UH, 0.64060, AND THERE REALLY IS NO SHORTFALL IN PARKING. IN FACT IS THERE'S A SURPLUS UNDER [00:40:01] E EVERY FORESEEABLE, UM, SCENARIO. BUT WE HAVE BEEN, AND WE'LL CONTINUE TO WORK WITH, UH, MR. BRALEY AND HIS CLIENT AND THE OTHER OFFICE BUILDING OWNER TO MAKE THE PMP THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN EVEN BETTER FOR EVERYONE INVOLVED. AND THAT DOESN'T STOP, YOU KNOW, IN A MONTH OR A WEEK. IT'S, IT'S, IT WILL CONTINUE. IT'S AN, IT'S AN ONGOING QUARTERLY ANALYSIS TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S IMPLEMENTED AND IT WORKS FOR EVERYONE WHO IS WITHIN THAT PORTION OF, UM, OF THE CITY. SO, AND I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE FOR THE UPDATE. THANK YOU, SIR. APPRECIATE THAT. UH, BEFORE, UH, ARE THERE ANYONE ELSE, IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE THIS EVENING THAT DESIRES TO SPEAK ON THIS MATTER? OKAY, SEEING NONE, WE'RE GONNA CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND SINCE WE'VE HAD A COUPLE OF ATTORNEYS AT THE PODIUM ADDRESSING THEIR ORGANIZATIONS AND THEIR CLIENT'S CONCERNS, I WOULD LIKE TO TURN TO OUR CITY ATTORNEY AND HAVE HIM, UH, MAYBE HELP US AS COUNCIL MEMBERS, UH, UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE COMMENTS AND YOUR RESPONSES TO THOSE. I'LL START OFF WITH THE, UH, COMMENTS ON THE CA DOCUMENT THAT WAS PREPARED FOR THIS PROJECT. I'VE MENTIONED FOUR PRIOR, UM, MIXED USE PROJECTS THAT HAVE COME BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL SINCE THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND ASSOCIATED EIR AND THAT'S THAT THE, THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THAT GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND DID A COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF IT AND THE EIR SO THAT IT COULD RELY ON STREAMLINING PROVISIONS AND THE SQL GUIDELINES FOR PROJECTS THAT MEET THE INTENT AND COMPLY WITH THE DENSITIES AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE GENERAL PLAN. STAFF DETERMINED THAT THIS PROJECT DIDN'T, WAS CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN AND THEREFORE APPLIED THE STREAMLINING PROVISIONS TO THIS PROJECT. I DISAGREE THAT THE LINING PROVISIONS DO NOT APPLY HERE. UM, THE BIOLOGICAL, ANY BIOLOGICAL IMPACT THAT WAS, UH, THAT IS PECULIAR TO THIS PROJECT OR THE SITE, I BELIEVE WAS ANALYZED FULLY IN THE EIR. BUT IN ADDITION, THE, UH, TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF THIS PROJECT PROVIDED SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE THAT THERE WAS NO SIGNIFICANT BIOLOGICAL IMPACT WITH RESPECT TO THE AIR QUALITY IMPACTS. I DISAGREE THAT, WELL, FIRST OFF, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THE CITY HAS ANY AUTHORITY TO, UH, REGULATE THE COMPOSITION OF WOOD MATERIALS. UM, SO EVEN IF IT WANTED TO, I DON'T THINK IT WOULD BE FEASIBLE TO MITIGATE THAT IMPACT. UM, AND SECOND, UH, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THE COMPOSITION OF WOOD MATERIALS IS, UH, PECULIAR TO THIS PROJECT OR THE SITE. UH, IT'S SOMETHING THAT EVERY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT'S GONNA HAVE TO DEAL WITH. SO I I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THERE IS A DEFECT IN THE, THE SQUA ANALYSIS BEFORE YOU, UH, WITH RESPECT TO THE PARKING ISSUES, UM, AT LEAST AS FAR AS THE COMMENTS GO TONIGHT, I ACTUALLY DIDN'T HEAR VERY MUCH OPPOSITION TO THE PROJECT, BUT I DID JUST WANT A DAYLIGHT AND CLARIFYING ISSUE FOR YOU. THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT'S ATTACHED AS I THINK IT'S ATTACHMENT FIVE TO THE STAFF REPORT DOES MAKE SOME CONCESSIONS ALREADY, UM, FOR A SHARED PARKING ARRANGEMENT WITH THE PROJECT. AND IT DOES SAY THAT BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 9:00 AM AND 5:00 PM MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, THAT, UH, BETWEEN PARCELS ONE AND THREE, THE TWO, UH, COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES BORDERING THIS PROJECT SITE, UH, 117, 116 SPACES WILL BE RESERVED EXCLUSIVELY FOR, UM, THE OFFICE SPACE, THE OFFICE BUILDINGS. UM, I'VE LOOKED AT THE, UH, ADDITIONAL REVISIONS TO THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT WERE PROPOSED THIS EVENING ABOUT AN HOUR BEFORE THIS MEETING. AND MY REVIEW OF THAT WOULD BE THAT APPROXIMATELY 400 OF THE, UH, 400 OF THE 5,450 SPACES, UH, ON THE SITE WOULD BE RESERVED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE OFFICE SPACES. SO I DO THINK THAT'S, UH, SOMETHING THAT THE PLANNING STAFF'S GOING TO HAVE TO LOOK AT, BECAUSE AT LEAST IN MY MIND, THAT MEANS THAT THERE WOULD BE NO, UH, PARKING SPACES FOR THE RESIDENTIAL, UH, USER, THE RES THE TENANTS OF THIS BUILDING BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 8:00 AM AND 5:00 PM MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY. AND NOW I IMAGINE THAT THE ARGUMENT IS THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE GOING BACK TO WORK AND THERE SHOULDN'T BE THAT MANY PEOPLE PARKING. UM, THERE ARE CARS BETWEEN, UH, THE HOURS OF 9:00 AM AND 5:00 PM UM, BUT I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S TRUE, AND I THINK THAT THE STAFF NEEDS TO LOOK AT IT, AND THAT'S PARTLY WHY, UH, THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN CONDITION HAS BEEN REVISED TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PLANNING DIRECTOR HAS TO APPROVE, UH, ANY, UH, REVISIONS TO THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN AND MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE NOT GONNA CAUSE A SIGNIFICANT PARKING IMPACT. SO I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTOOD WHAT THAT MEANT BEFORE YOU MOVE FORWARD. VERY GOOD, THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS? I HAVE ONE, MR. MAYOR? YES, SIR. UH, AND THAT'S A QUESTION FOR STAFF. ONE [00:45:01] THING THAT MR. BAILEY MENTIONED WAS, UH, IN I APPROVING THIS PROJECT, UH, THAT HE SAID THAT THE CODE MANDATED 520 SPACES AVAILABLE FOR HIS AND THE OTHER COMMERCIAL BUILDING NECESSARY, AND THE APPROVAL OF THIS, UH, DEVELOPMENT PROJECT WOULD TAKE HIM OUT OF CODE COMPLIANCE WITH THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING PLACES THAT HE HAD. I'D LIKE TO JUST GET SOME CLARITY ON THAT. UH, I'LL, I WILL KICK THIS OVER TO SEAN, BUT I DID WANT TO STATE THAT, YOU KNOW, I I DON'T BELIEVE THAT ANY ACTION THAT YOU TAKE ON THIS PROJECT TONIGHT, UM, WOULD PUT THE, WOULD COMPROMISE THE, UM, TWO OFFICE BUILDINGS IN SO FAR AS THAT THEY WOULD BE OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH OUR CODE. TO THE EXTENT THAT THE CODE HAS CHANGED SINCE THEIR PROJECT WAS FIRST APPROVED. UH, OUR CODE PROVIDES A, UM, A GRANDFATHER, WE PROTECT THE RIGHTS OF EXISTING PROPERTY, UH, PROPERTIES THAT HAVE DEVELOPED UNDER PRIOR ADDITIONS OF THE CODE WHEN THERE'S CHANGES THAT HAPPEN THAT ARE NOT THEIR FAULT OF THEIR OWN. OKAY. MAKES SENSE. UM, OTHER QUESTION WAS GONNA BE, AND I JUST WANTED TO NAIL THIS DOWN, NICK, DID I HEAR YOU CORRECTLY, YOU SAID THAT THERE'S GONNA BE 116 DAYTIME SPACES THAT ARE RESERVED EXCLUSIVELY FOR THE TWO COMMERCIAL OFFICE BUILDINGS. TOM, BUT CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT I'M LOOKING AT TABLE A OF THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN AND IT SAYS THAT, UM, PARCEL ONE OFFICE EXCLUSIVE 9:00 AM TO 5:00 PM MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY IS, UH, 70 SPACES ON PARCEL TWO AND PARCEL THREE, OFFICE EXCLUSIVE 9:00 AM TO 5:00 PM MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY IS 46 SPACES EXCLUSIVE, SO THAT'S 116. OKAY. AND IS, DID I HEAR IT CORRECT THAT MR. BAILEY'S ASKING FOR 217 IS ABOUT A HUNDRED AND MORE, 101 MORE EXCLUSIVE ONES FOR, DID I HEAR THAT CORRECT? YES, BUT THERE'S ALSO SOME SPACES THAT ARE GOING TO BE UNDER THE PLAN. THERE WOULD BE SOME ADDITIONAL SPACES FOR THE OTHER OFFICE BUILDING RESERVED FOR THEM TOO. OKAY. I UNDERSTAND. I CERTAINLY WILL AGREE WITH MR. BRALEY WHEN HE MENTIONS, UM, THE FACT THAT OUR JURISDICTION, UH, IS LIMITED BY STATE LAW, CERTAINLY ON HOW MUCH, UH, PARKING THAT WE CAN GRANT OR WE JUST CAN'T GRANT, IT'S, UH, LITERALLY MANDATED THAT ONCE AN APPLICANT COMES FORWARD AND DECIDES TO GO THE DENSITY BONUS ROUTE FOR, UM, MORE AFFORDABLE HOUSING, UH, OUR HANDS ARE ACTUALLY TIED TO A GREAT DEGREE AND HOW MUCH PARKING THAT WE CAN, UM, ALLOW. AND THAT DISCRETION DOES GO AWAY. AND I THINK IT'S PROBABLY IMPORTANT FOR EVERYONE LISTENING, UH, TO NOTE THAT, UH, WE ARE A HUGE PROPONENT IN THIS RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL OF LOCAL CONTROL AND HAVING CONTROL OVER, UM, ZONING LAWS AND STANDARDS IN OUR OWN CITY, AND IT MAKES THINGS EXPONENTIALLY MORE COMPLICATED WHEN WE ARE FORCED TO FOLLOW RULES FROM A GROUP OF 120 PEOPLE 300 MILES AWAY. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? OKAY. UM, I JUST A COUPLE COMMENTS. ONE, UM, THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN, I, I APPRECIATE THE, THE, UM, BARTON REPRESENTATIVE, MR. BRALEY AND, UH, STAFF WORKING TOGETHER WITH THEM TO BE FLEXIBLE AS TIME MOVES ON WHERE THERE'S CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS THAT ARE APPROPRIATE. WE'VE DEALT WITH SOME OTHER PARKING MANAGEMENT PLANS AND, AND WE'RE WORKING THROUGH THAT AND IT'S BECOMING MORE AND MORE, UH, UH, UH, TENABLE, I WOULD SAY. UM, BUT I WANT TO ASK, UH, THE, THE PARKING ITSELF, THE DENSITY BONUS ALLOWED FOR, UM, THE OPPORTUNITY FOR THEM TO DO 431 PARKING SPACES, BUT, UM, AND THEN OF THAT 64 WERE FOR THE, THE, THE, UH, COMMERCIAL PORTION OF THE, OF THE PROJECT. CORRECT. AND, AND THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED 456 PARKING SPACES? UH, THAT WOULD BE CORRECT, YES. SO IT SHOWS ME THAT, THAT THEY'RE GOING FORWARD TO TRY TO GO BEYOND WHAT WOULD LEGALLY BE REQUIRED UNDER STATE LAW, AND I APPRECIATE THAT AS WELL AS WITH THE PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN. UM, I, I WOULD HAVE TO SAY THAT I WOULD AGREE WITH MY COLLEAGUE THAT, UM, AT LOCAL GOVERNMENT LEVELS, WE'RE GETTING TIRED OF STATE CONTINUING TO ERODE OUR ABILITY TO PROVIDE LOCAL CONTROL TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE DOING THE RIGHT THING FOR THE RIGHT REASONS, FOR NOT ONLY OUR RESIDENTS, BUT OUR BUSINESS COMMUNITY. AND, UH, WE ARE ALWAYS, UH, FIGHTING THAT WITH THE STATE. WE BELIEVE IN LOCAL CONTROL AND WE WILL CONTINUE THAT FIGHT. UM, BUT I, I GUESS, UM, THE ONE THING FOR ME, I, I, I REALLY APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT YOU'RE DOING VERY LOW AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS, UM, THAT THIS CITY NEEDS THAT, AND, AND THAT'S VERY, VERY GOOD FOR, AND [00:50:01] WE APPRECIATE THAT VERY, VERY MUCH. BUT I'D ALSO SAY THAT, UM, WE HAVE A OUTSTANDING PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION SUPPORTED THIS PROJECT ON A UNANIMOUS VOTE. AND, UH, I CERTAINLY, UH, SUPPORT OUR PLANNING COMMISSION. I KNOW MY, ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES DO THE SAME, FEEL THE SAME WAY. SO, UM, IF THERE'S NO FURTHER QUESTIONS, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK IF WE COULD HAVE A MOTION, JUST A MOMENT HERE, UM, TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023 DASH 0 0 7 AND 2023 DASH ZERO EIGHT, DENYING THE APPEALS IDENTIFIED AS DRC 2022 DASH 0 0 4 4 5 AND DRC 2022 DASH 0 4 4 9 AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW DRC NUMBER 2019 DASH 0 8 5. MR. MAY MAYOR, IF I MAY, UH, WITH THE, WOULD THAT, UH, MOTION INCLUDE THE MODIFICATION TO, I THINK IT'S PLANNING CONDITION NUMBER, PLANNING CONDITION NUMBER FIVE? ABSOLUTELY. THAT INCLUDES THAT I MOVE THAT WE DENY THE APPEALS DRC 20 0 20 22 DASH 0 0 4 4 5 AND DRC 2022 DASH 0 0 4 4 9 WITH THE MODIFICATION NUMBER FIVE. THAT'S, UH, TO BE CLEAR, THAT'S PLANNING CONDITION NUMBER THREE, PLANNING COMM, PLANNING CONDITION NUMBER THREE AND I INCLUDE TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW DRCS 2019 DASH 0 0 8 50, AND WITH THE UNDERSTANDING, UM, THAT MR. WMU WOULD STILL CONSIDER, UM, WORKING WITH HIS NEIGHBORS AND MAKING SURE HE IS CONSCIOUS OF ALL THEIR IMPACTS. I'LL MAKE A SECOND. OKAY. THANK YOU. PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR PRESENTATIONS. MUCH APPRECIATED. OUR NEXT ITEM IS ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING. I'LL TURN THAT BACK OVER AGAIN TO OUR CITY MANAGER. UM, MR. GILLISON, MR. MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL, YOU HAVE A SECOND PUBLIC HEARING HERE THIS EVENING, AND THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONDUCT FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 10 15 TO BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING. IT WOULD AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, MAKE VARIOUS TECHNICAL TEXT AMENDMENTS, AMEND THE CURRENT ZONING MAP WITH VARIOUS TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS, AND THE CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023 DASH 0 0 5, WHICH WOULD AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND MAP WITH VARIOUS TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS. THESE ARE ALL CLEANUPS FROM OUR RECENT, UH, UPDATES TO THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE DEVELOPMENT CODE. SO, UH, THE CITY HAS PREPARED AN ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR FOR THIS PROJECT. SO WITH THAT, LET ME TURN IT OVER TO DAVID EO, OUR SENIOR PLANNER, AND SEAN MCPHERSON, AND THEY'LL GIVE YOU THE STAFF REPORT ON THIS ITEM. THANK YOU, UH, MR. CITY MANAGER, MR. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL, IT'S ALWAYS A PLEASURE TO BE BEFORE YOU. OKAY. UH, AS THE MAJORITY OF YOU WILL RECALL IN DECEMBER, 2021, THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTED THE CURRENT GENERAL PLAN, WHICH DOCUMENTS THE CITY'S LONG RANGE VISION AND ESTABLISHES GOALS AND ACTIONS TO GUIDE THE COMMUNITY THROUGH THE NEXT 10 TO 20 YEARS OF, OF CHANGE AND DEVELOPMENT. UH, SUBSEQUENT TO THE ADOPTION OF THE GENERAL PLAN IN DECEMBER, 2021. AND IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THAT VISION, STAFF EMBARKED ON A COMPREHENSIVE, REALLY A TEAR DOWN AND A REBUILD OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH IS THAT PRIMARY IMPLEMENTING TOOL, UH, TO ENACT THE GENERAL PLAN'S GOALS AND POLICIES. THIS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT CODE UPDATE WAS ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL IN MAY OF, UH, 2022. NOW THAT, UH, PLANNING STAFF HAS HAD A FEW MONTHS TO PUT THIS INTO EFFECT, UH, IS IT HAS BECOME CLEAR, UM, THAT CERTAIN CLEANUP AND CLARIFYING AMENDMENTS ARE NECESSARY. AS THE COUNCIL HAS HEARD BEFORE, STAFF BELIEVES THAT THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, UH, BELIEVES THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO BE A LIVING DOCUMENT, WHICH IS EXPECTED TO CHANGE OVER TIME, TO KEEP PACE WITH THE EVER-EVOLVING DYNAMICS OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. UH, HENCE OUR BEING HERE TONIGHT. I SHOULD NOTE THAT, UH, THIS IS ANTICIPATED TO BE THE FIRST IN A MINISERIES OF CODE AMENDMENTS, WHICH THE COUNCIL WILL LIKELY SEE, UH, THIS YEAR. UH, THAT SAID, I WILL TURN OVER TO DAVID EF, OUR SENIOR PLANNER TO, UH, GET US STARTED. OKAY, THANKS SEAN. UH, SO THE FIRST OF [00:55:01] OUR TECHNICAL CLEANUPS TONIGHT RELATES TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND MAP. UM, THERE ARE SEVERAL PARCELS, UH, THROUGHOUT THE CITY THAT WERE INADVERTENTLY CHANGED, UH, TO A NEW LAND USE DURING THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE IN 2021. AND THAT NEW LAND USE ACTUALLY CONFLICTS WITH THE EXISTING USES ON THE PROPERTY TODAY. SO, UH, THERE ARE EIGHT PARCELS INCLUDED WITH THIS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT. YOU CAN SEE THEY'RE, THEY'RE SPREAD THROUGHOUT THE CITY. THE TECHNICAL CLEANUP WILL PUT MANY OF THEM BACK TO THEIR PRIOR DESIGNATION, WHICH INCLUDES RESIDENTIAL, UH, THE TRADITIONAL TOWN CENTER AND IN NEO INDUSTRIAL. AND THERE'S ALSO TWO OTHERS THAT WILL BE CHANGED TO INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT, UH, TO ALLOW, ALLOW A BROADER RANGE OF, UH, DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES THAT MIGHT BE MORE CONDUCIVE TO THE SITE AND THE SURROUNDING AREAS. SO OUR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, UM, REALLY IS ESSENTIALLY A TECHNICAL CLEANUP FOR THESE EIGHT PARCELS. THE ZONING MAP, UH, THERE ARE, THERE ARE SEVERAL, SEVERAL ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS TO POINT OUT. THE FIRST ONE IS THE OPEN SPACE FLOOD CONTROL UTILITY CORRIDOR ZONE. YOU CAN SEE IT OUTLINED THERE IN RED, UH, TO THE LEFT. SO OUR, OUR CURRENT ZONING MAP ON THE RIGHT AND THE LEGEND TO THE LEFT, UH, YOU SEE THESE THREE ZONES ARE, ARE, THEY'RE THREE ZONES, BUT THEY'RE REFLECTED AS ONE COLOR ON THE MAP. UM, THIS IS CAUSED, UH, CONFUSION WITH IDENTIFYING THE PROPER ZONE, UH, IDENTIFYING ALLOWED USES NOT ONLY FOR CITY STAFF, BUT ALSO FOR THE PUBLIC. SO TO, TO ADDRESS THIS, THE ZONING MAP IS BEING AMENDED TO SEPARATE THESE ZONES INTO THREE SEPARATE ZONES FOR BETTER CLARITY. THE MAP, UH, HERE REFLECTS ALL OF THE AFFECTED PARCELS THAT ARE INCLUDED WITH THE OPEN SPACE AMENDMENT. UH, YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENT COLORS FOR EACH CORRESPONDING ZONE, AND THE LEGEND HAS ALSO BEEN UPDATED TO REFLECT THE SAME. UH, THIS WILL HELP CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE INTENT OF EACH OPEN SPACE ZONE AND THEIR ALLOWED USES. THERE ARE ALSO, UH, A FEW OTHER NOTABLE ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS OUTLINED ON THE MAP. UH, WE HAVE A RESIDENTIAL AREA OUTLINED IN ORANGE AND A COUPLE INDUSTRIAL AREAS OUTLINED IN BLUE. UH, THE RESIDENTIAL AREA IS AN EXISTING, UH, RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THE SITE RIGHT NOW IS ZONED, UH, HIGH RESIDENTIAL. UM, THAT WAS DONE AGAIN INADVERTENTLY AS PART OF THE PREVIOUS CODE UPDATE. UH, BUT THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD IS ACTUALLY A SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE HIGH RESIDENTIAL ZONE IS GEARED MORE TOWARDS MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. SO YOU HAVE A, A PRETTY BIG CONFLICT THERE. UM, SO THESE AREAS WILL BE REZONED FROM THE HIGH DESIGNATION BACK TO THE MEDIUM AND MEDIUM HIGH, WHICH ESSENTIALLY PUTS IT BACK TO ITS PREVIOUS ZONING. AND THE FIRST OF THE INDUSTRIAL AREAS IS, UH, IS FOR THE ZONING MAP AMENDMENT IS, UH, ONE THAT WAS NOTED EARLY AS PART OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS. UM, THE SITE IS BEING AMENDED TO THE INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT AND TO ENSURE THAT THERE IS CONSISTENCY BETWEEN THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE ZONING MAP, WE HAVE TO UPDATE THE ZONING FOR THESE SITES TOO. SO THIS SITE WILL BE, UH, AMENDED FOR THE ZONING TO INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT AS WELL. AND SIMILARLY TO THE SECOND INDUSTRIAL PARCEL, THE SAME WOULD APPLY. UM, THIS WAS ALSO INCLUDED AS PART OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND MAP AMENDMENTS. UM, IT'S BEING REVERTED BACK TO ITS PREVIOUS DESIGNATION OF NEO INDUSTRIAL. UM, SO IT, SO AGAIN, TO ENSURE THAT CONSISTENCY, UH, THE ZONING IS ALSO BEING AMENDED FOR THIS SITE TOO. BACK TO NEO INDUSTRIAL. THANK YOU, DAVID. SO, UM, BEYOND THE MAP CHANGES REGARDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENTS, UH, THESE CONSIST OF, UH, VARIOUS TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS TO DIFFERENT SECTIONS OF THE CODE, WHICH INCLUDE THE ADDITIONS OF NEW SECTIONS AND NEW LANGUAGE, AS WELL AS REVISIONS TO EXISTING CODE LANGUAGE. UH, NEW ADDITIONS, JUST IN PART VERY BRIEFLY. NEW ADDITIONS INCLUDE THINGS LIKE, UH, NEW STANDARDS FOR DRIVE-IN AND DRIVE-THROUGH, USES NEW STANDARDS FOR LIVE WORK UNITS, UH, AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. UM, REGARDING CLARIFICATION OF EXISTING CODE LANGUAGE, UH, YOU WOULD SEE CHANGES SUCH AS MINOR TEXT EDITS AND CLARIFYING LANGUAGE WITHIN OUR BRAND NEW FORM-BASED CODE AND REVISIONS TO A DU STANDARDS, UH, AND SO ON. AND AS DAVID HAD MENTIONED, UH, WITH REGARD TO THE CHANGES IN THE OPEN SPACE DESIGNATIONS ON THE MAPS, UH, WE HAVE CORRESPONDING TEXT AMENDMENTS TO SHOW THAT CHANGE. IT JUST MAKES IT A LOT EASIER TO IMPLEMENT, UH, AND A LOT EASIER TO UNDERSTAND, UH, FOR BOTH SIDES OF THE COUNTER WHEN WE HAVE THESE DISCUSSIONS. UH, WITH REGARD TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, UM, THE PLANNING COMMISSION, UH, RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ADDENDUM, UH, TO THE EIR, UH, WHICH WAS, UH, APPROVED. UM, PREVIOUSLY, UH, REGARDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW ON DECEMBER 13TH, 2022, THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL NOT ONLY ADOPT THE EIR ADDENDUM, BUT ALSO APPROVE THE REQUESTED AMENDMENTS. UH, AT THAT TIME ON THE DECEMBER 13TH MEETING, THERE WERE SOME, UM, CHANGES AND TYPOS AND MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS THAT STAFF HAD IDENTIFIED IN THE STAFF REPORT THAT NEEDED TO BE CLARIFIED. THOSE WERE CLARIFIED AT THE, UH, PLANNING COMMISSION, PUBLIC HEARING, AND INCLUDED IN THEIR, UH, APPROVAL, THEIR RECOMMENDATION FOR THE COUNCIL TO APPROVE. UH, THAT [01:00:01] SAID, UM, PLANNING COMMISSION AND STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL CONDUCT A FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 1 0 1 5 AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 2023 DASH 0 0 0 5. UH, FOR THE FOLLOWING ITEMS DISCUSSED ADOPTION OF THE ADDENDUM TO THE GENERAL PLAN EIR, ADOPTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT CODE, TEXT AMENDMENTS, ADOPTION OF THE ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS, AND LASTLY, THE ADOPTION OF THE GENERAL PLAN LAND MAP AMENDMENTS. THIS IS A CITY INITIATED ITEM, SO THERE IS NO APPLICANT. UH, BUT WITH THAT, UH, DAVID AND I ARE READY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS? UH, STAFF OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SEEING NONE, PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. IS THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC THAT ARE HERE IN ATTENDANCE THIS EVENING THAT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS MATTER? SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO THE COUNCIL FOR ANY COMMENTS THEY MAY HAVE. AND IF NONE OF THOSE, WE WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ADOPT THESE CLARIFICATIONS TO ADOPT RESOLUTIONS NUMBER 2023 DASH 0 0 5 AND 2020 AND ORDINANCE NUMBER 1 0 1 5 TO BE READ BY TITLE ONLY AND WAIVE FERTILE READINGS, A MOTION TO THAT EFFECT. MOTION TO APPROVE. SECOND MADAM CLERK HOT, MIKE. ORDINANCE NUMBER 1 0 1 5. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CU, CALIFORNIA APPROVING MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT DRC 20 22 0 0 4 6 4 TO AMEND TITLE 17 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE IS SUPPLEMENTAL UPDATE TO THE DEVELOPMENT CODE ADOPTING ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC 2 2 2 0 0 4 6 6 APPLICABLE TO VARIOUS PROPERTIES LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND ADOPTING AN ADDENDUM TO THE CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, SCH NUMBER 2 2 100 502 6 1 FOR THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE AND CLIMATE ACTION PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS AND SUPPORT THEREOF. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR REPORTS. APPRECIATE IT VERY MUCH FOR THE CLEANUP. NO CITY MANAGER STAFF REPORTS THIS EVENING. SO WE'LL MOVE ON. THERE ARE, UH, THREE ITEMS FOR COUNCIL BUSINESS, AND THE FIRST ONE IS CONSIDERATION AND DISCUSSION OF A SELECTION OF OUR MAYOR PRO TEM. THERE'S NO STAFF REPORT OR ANYTHING, IT'S JUST A DISCUSSION AMONGST US COUNCIL MEMBERS. SO IS THERE ANYONE INTERESTED IN SERVING AS MAYOR, PRO TEM MAYOR AND COLLEAGUES? I WOULD APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONTINUE REPRESENTING US AS COLLEAGUES, AS WELL AS THE RESIDENTS AS MAYOR PRO TEM. VERY GOOD. MAY I HAVE A MOTION TO THAT EFFECT? MOTION TO APPROVE MAYOR PRO TEM LYNN KENNEDY IS AND STAYING IN HER CURRENT SEAT. I'LL SECOND. I SECOND. OKAY. LET'S PLEASE VOTE. I'M NOT QUITE SURE YET. . MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. JUST KIDDING. OF COURSE. CONGRATULATIONS, MAYOR PRO, TIM KENNEDY. OUR NEXT ITEM IS, UH, REVIEW OF APPOINTMENTS TO STANDING COMMITTEES, BOARDS, AND OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. SO WE WILL DO THAT AGAIN. UM, WE'VE READ THE STAFF REPORT, SO LET'S JUST GO DOWN THE LIST IF THAT'D BE OKAY. AND WE WILL START WITH, UH, OUR STANDING COMMITTEES, AND THAT IS COMMUNITY SERVICES. THERE IS A VACANCY, CHRISTINE SCOTT IS ONE OF THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS. WE NEED SOMEONE TO STEP UP TO FILL THE VACANCY. IF CHRISTINE IS STILL INTERESTED IN CONTINUING. I WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE SERVING ON THIS COMMITTEE. VERY GOOD. AND MR. MAYOR, JUST FOR THE RECORD, UM, FOR ANYONE FOLLOWING ALONG THE VACANCIES ARE, ARE THERE, THERE ARE VACANCIES THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY FILLED BY COUNCIL MEMBER SPAGNOLO WHEN HE WAS ON THE COUNCIL, CORRECT YOU FOR THAT. I WOULD LIKE TO FILL THAT VACANCY. OKAY. SO WE'LL HAVE, UH, COUNCILWOMAN CHRISTINE SCOTT AND COUNCILMAN ASHLEY STICKLER FOR COMMUNITY SERVICES SUBCOMMITTEE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HISTORIC PRESERVATION SUBCOMMITTEES, OR AS MYSELF AND MAYOR PRO TEM KENNEDY. IF ANYONE HAS A BURNING DESIRE TO REPLACE EITHER ONE OF US, UM, YOU'RE SO WELCOME TO RAISE YOUR CONCERN. SO WE'LL KEEP THAT AS IT IS. LIBRARY SUBCOMMITTEE IS CHRISTINE SCOTT AND LYNN KENNEDY. ANY CHANGES TO THAT? OKAY. PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION. THAT'S RYAN HUTCHINSON AND LYNN KENNEDY AND I SEE NO OPPOSITION TO THAT. UM, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND MARKETING SUBCOMMITTEE, AGAIN, OUR MAYOR, PRO TEM KENNEDY AND COUNCIL MEMBER HUTCHINSON. UH, WE'LL CONTINUE WITH THAT. UH, AND TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATION SUBCOMMITTEE. THAT'S OUR MAYOR PRO TEM KENNEDY AND THE VACANCY CREATED BY US, UH, THE VACANCY FROM, FOR SAM SPAGNOLO AS ANYONE INTERESTED IN SERVING ON THE TECHNOLOGY AND COMMUNICATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE. OF COURSE YOU DO. I WOULD LIKE TO FILL THAT ONE. VERY GOOD. [01:05:01] THANK YOU. SO WE WILL HAVE COUNCILWOMAN ASHLEY STICKLER ALONG WITH OUR MAYOR PRO TEM COMMUNITY PARKS AND RECREATION CITIZEN OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE. CHRISTINE SCOTT. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO FILL THAT VACANCY? IF NOT, I WOULD LIKE TO FILL THAT ONE AS WELL. YOU, YOU? OKAY. YOU'RE VERY GOOD. THAT WILL BE ASHLEY STICKLER. UM, THAT'S ALL OF THE STANDING COMMITTEES, I BELIEVE, CORRECT, CORRECT AMENDMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS AND REGIONAL AGENCIES. SO WE WILL NOW START WITH, UH, THE CITY SELECT COMMITTEE, WHICH IS WHOEVER THE MAYOR IS, IS ALWAYS THE PERSON, UH, ASSIGNED US TO VOTE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY FOR ANYTHING DEALING WITH, UM, CITY SELECTIONS AS ON THE COUNTYWIDE BASIS. OUR CONFIRE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS LYNN KENNEDY WITH AN ALTERNATIVE. CHRISTINE SCOTT. YOU'LL SEE ANY REASON TO CHANGE THAT UNLESS SOMEONE REQUESTS THAT WE WILL MOVE ON TO OMNI TRANS. UM, THE DELEGATE IS LYNN KENNEDY AND THE ALTERNATE AGAIN IS COUNCILWOMAN CHRISTINE SCOTT. I KNOW THAT, UM, COUNCILWOMAN SCOTT HAS EXPRESSED AN INTEREST IN OMNI TRANS AND I'D BE WILLING TO ALLOW, UM, MAKE THAT CHANGE IF YOU'RE STILL INTERESTED. AND SINCE I WAS SAM'S ALTERNATE, ASHLEY, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO TAKE A POSITION AND BE THE ALTERNATE ON THAT AND AS AN TRAN, IF, IF YOU'RE INTERESTED OR IT'S UP TO YOU. YES, PLEASE. OKAY. AND I WOULD LIKE TO ACCEPT THAT. THANK YOU. OKAY. WE HAVE THAT DOWN. ANY OPPOSITION TO THAT ONE? OKAY. RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. I'M THE DELEGATE WITH LYNN KENNEDY AS THE ALTERNATE. I UNDERSTAND THAT COUNCILWOMAN SCOTT WOULD LIKE TO SERVE AS THE DELEGATE FOR, UM, THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND, AND IF THERE'S SOMEONE WHO WOULD LIKE TO BE THE ALTERNATE, I AM OPEN TO ALLOW SOMEONE TO STEP INTO THAT ROLE. I WOULDN'T MIND SERVING AS THE ALTERNATE TO THE, UH, CHAMBER. OKAY. SO WE WILL CHANGE THAT TO, UM, THE DELEGATE BE COUNCILWOMAN CHRISTINE SCOTT AND THE ALTERNATE WILL BE COUNCIL MEMBER RYAN HUTCHINSON. THE, UH, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY. I AM THE DELEGATE AND MY MAYOR PROTI IS THE ALTERNATE. AND I WOULD LIKE TO, AT LEAST FOR THIS NEXT TWO YEAR TERM TO CONTINUE SERVING. I'M ON THEIR TRANSIT COMMITTEE AND THAT'S, UM, A PRETTY CRITICAL COMMITTEE AS WE MOVE FORWARD FOR RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE FULL BOARD, ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THE BRIGHT LINE WEST PROPOSAL FOR HIGH SPEED RAIL TO THE CUCAMONGA STATION. SO IF THAT CONTINUITY IS VERY IMPORTANT AND SINCE YOU'RE NEVER REALLY EVER ABSENT, I DON'T MIND BEING THE ALTERNATE. OKAY. GOOD , UM, SOLID WASTE ADVISORY TASK FORCE IS COUNCIL MEMBER HUTCHINSON, AS WELL AS THE ALTERNATE IS LINDA SABALOS. UM, SINCE COUNCIL MEMBER HUTCHINSON, HE LOVES TO TALK TRASH. I THINK HE SHOULD STAY IN THAT POSITION. HE, HE LOVES THIS. SO THAT'S A GOOD ONE. HE DOES ENJOYS THAT. GOOD. , I'M PASSIONATE ABOUT SOLID WASTE, AND THE MOLO FOUNDATION. UM, ANY INTEREST IN THAT? I THINK I WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND AND IF POSSIBLE, UM, TO HAVE, I'D BE WILLING TO STEP DOWN IF SOMEONE ELSE IS, UM, WILLING TO BE THE BOARD MEMBER FOR THIS. I'M WILLING TO STEP UP FOR THAT. THANK YOU COUNCILWOMAN STICKLER BECAUSE, UM, THAT, THAT FACILITY IS IN YOUR DISTRICT. YES, I THINK THAT'S, THAT'S GREAT. PERFECT. OKAY. SO, AND, AND MR. GILLISON, YOU WOULD CONTINUE TO SERVE AS THE ALTERNATE IF THE COUNCIL SO DESIRES, BUT I'M ALSO WILLING TO STEP ASIDE IF ANYONE ELSE IS INTERESTED. SO I THINK WE'VE GOT ANOTHER TERM, UM, AS ALTERNATE. OKAY. UNLESS THERE IS SOMEBODY THAT REALLY HAS A BURNING DESIRE TO KICK JOHN OFF THIS COMMITTEE. OKAY. UM, THE, UM, ENHANCED INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT, WE HAVE MEMBERS, UH, REPRESENTING THE CITY IS MYSELF, CHRISTINE, LINDA DANIELS, AND THE ALTERNATE IS RYAN HUTCHINSON. ON THE FIRE BOARD WE HAVE LYNN KENNEDY, FRANCISCO AKA. AND WE HAVE A VACANCY AS THE ALTERNATE. AND SO WE NEED TO FILL THAT VACANCY. I'D BE HAPPY TO DO IT, MR. MAYOR. OKAY. AS AN ALTERNATE. OKAY. WOULD THAT CAUSE A PROBLEM? YEAH, BECAUSE RYAN'S THE ALTERNATE ON THE CITY SIDE. YEAH. SO IF WE HAD A DUAL VACANCY, HE CAN'T FILL THOSE SEATS. OKAY. I'LL FILL THAT ONE. OKAY. GOOD TRY RYAN. THAT WAS A GOOD IDEA. UM, SO THAT IS ASHLEY STICKLER. UM, AND THAT CONCLUDES, I BELIEVE THAT CONCLUDES YES. IT ALL [01:10:01] VERY GOOD. AND YOU GOT THAT MADAM CLERK, ALL OF THAT? YES, WE DID. OKAY, VERY GOOD. THANK YOU SO MUCH. WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO OUR LAST, UM, ITEM. AND THAT'S THE ITEM DEALING WITH THIS SELECTION OF A DELEGATE FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS S SCAG GENERAL ASSEMBLY. I KNOW LAST YEAR, COUNCILWOMAN SCOTT WAS OUR DELEGATE. ARE YOU ATTENDING ONGOING AGAIN? YES, I DO. IF MAYOR MICHAEL, EXCUSE ME. UM, CAN WE HAVE A MOTION IN A SECOND FOR ITEM ON? OH, I'M WE'LL BACK UP. OKAY. SINCE IT IS AN ACTION ITEM YES. THAT IT'S JUST ONE MOTION WE DEPART, CAN WE JUST HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ALL OF THE COMMITTEE AND, AND ORGANIZATIONAL, UM, REPRESENTATIVES THAT WE JUST APPROVED. MOVE FOR APPROVAL. SECOND, PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. THANK YOU MADAM CLERK. READ THEM ALL. , UH, UH, THE CITY SELECT COMMITTEE. SO, UH, I'M HAPPY TO HAVE YOU DO THAT. I'M PROBABLY NOT GONNA BE ABLE TO ATTEND THIS YEAR AGAIN. UH, UNFORTUNATELY, MAY IS A TOUGH TIME OF YEAR, THAT FIRST WEEK, END OF MAY, OR WEEK IN MAY. UM, IS THERE AN ALTERNATE THAT WOULD LIKE TO BE IN CASE CHRISTINE CANNOT ATTEND? IT'S HELD IN PALM DESERT AT THE, UH, AT THE, UH, UM, DESERT SPRINGS HOTEL. I CAN SERVE AS THE ALTERNATE MR. MAYOR. OKAY, VERY GOOD. SO WE HAVE THAT MOVE FOR APPROVAL. I'LL SECOND THAT AND SECOND PLEASE VOTE. MOTION CARRIES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE. OKAY. AND THAT CONCLUDES OUR COUNCIL APPOINTMENTS AND NOW WE'LL MOVE ON TO CITY MANAGER, STAFF REPORT, COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS, CITY MANAGER STAFF REPORTS. AND WE ALREADY DID THAT, BUT WE'RE NOT COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS. ANY OF THOSE, ANY INTER AGENCY UPDATES. I'M SURE OUR CITY ATTORNEY HAS SEVERAL ITEMS WE'D LIKE TO DISCUSS. I'LL SPARE YOU TONIGHT AND I HAVE NO REPORTABLE ACTION. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR, FOR YOUR REPORT EARLIER ON IN THE PUBLIC HEARING. APPRECIATED THAT VERY MUCH. ANY ITEMS, UH, FOR IDENTIFICATION FOR OUR NEXT MEETING, WHICH IS FEBRUARY 1ST OF THIS, THIS FIRST PART OF 2003 23. EXCUSE ME, THIS HEARING? NONE. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, THANK YOU ALL FOR ATTENDING THIS EVENING. WE ARE NOW ADJOURNED. THANK. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.